[ad_1]
Corporate news has, once again, taken aim at One America News, this time targeting OAN’s report on a UCLA and Stanford study regarding coronavirus fatality rates. OAN’s Pearson Sharp fact-checked the team at ‘Verify’ and found they should do a little more verification before coming after OAN.
Visit us at:
Tired of censorship from other social media platforms? Join us on Free Talk
Free Talk is OANs new social platform.
Users can post, chat and connect with other members.
It allows Free Speech at home, on the go and anywhere in the world, No SHADOWBANNING!
https://freetalk.app
Website: https://www.oann.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/OneAmericaNewsNetwork
Twitter: https://twitter.com/OANN
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/one_america_news_/
KlowdTV:
Watch OAN Live on KlowdTV subscription prices start at $4.99 /mo
https://klowdtv.com
source
[ad_2]
The CCP-virus is being overhyped so much that it sounds like Gavin Newsom blaming the fires in California on climate change rather than on his bad management policies.
Out of the falsely reported 200000 dead from kung flu only 9,345 are from the flu. The media lies the demorats LIED. It's all about power and control. 93% of the 200,000 already were sick from pre existing conditions. Check the latest FACTS PUT OUT BY CDC INSTEAD OF LISTENING TO THE.LYING MEDIA AND DEMORATS END THE MASKS AND SHUTDOWN NOW!
Media false "fact checks" are merely outlets for Leftist propaganda, trying to throw the election for the Democrats. Won't work.
Keep up the good work!! Maybe is the TRUTH gets repeated enough people will start to hear and understand what it is.
We know it's (CV19) a joke, but thank you for spelling it out for the complete retards. 🙂
thank you
Excellent
ITM
My sister is a nurse in CT …she said the hospital is checking everyone in to the ER as a COVIDPatient …goes to show anytime the Govt subsidizes anything …there is zero oversight, rampant fraud and zero accountabilitiy
Well, one death in nineteen million? The us has already 200.000 deaths.
Bravo!! Well done!
The statistics used are not surprising to me at all. This entire charade is nothing more than a leftist attempt at bringing down the most successful president ever in the history of the United States.. because he isn’t a career politician who will dance to their music.. well done OAN!!!
The media only said how dangerous it was wen they could use it against Trump. Wen Trump said he was going to stop flights they called him ridiculous. Now they said he didn't do enough.
Trump 2020
OAN is the top news outlet going mainstream. Love ya!
there's got to be a law to severely penalize the msm for lying.
Oan expose the swamp fake news media!!!like cnn and msnbc,abc
OAN rocks!!!
Great Reporting !! Thanks 🙏
MSM'S "Believe the science." When real science comes out,"Don't believe that science since we did not agree with it." Debate is science, not authoritarian politics.
Where can I read this study in detail?
The Left is more concerned about keeping lies alive than people.
The media sees malfeasance in all statistics except its own. And its "fact checkers" are even worse! lulz
MSM hurts it self by hiding the truth. Lying about the true
Meaning of anything.
👋☕️⚖️
OAN is the best!!!!!!!
It needs to be stressed that these are odds *per contact*. Not the odds of dying if you contract the virus. It's the odds of (1) catching the virus, (2) going to the hospital, and (3) then dying from it, IF you are in that age group and have had contact with one random person.
Walk along a sidewalk past forty people and you've now had forty "person contacts". It can add up quickly.
Using their figures, IF you contract the virus, and are in the age group 50 to 64, you have a 1 in 222 chance of being hospitalized (0.45%) and a roughly 1 in 5000 chance of dying (0.02%). Pretty low odds. It's really only the very elderly who need protection.
Hold on. 7B divided by 19M equals 368.42. In words, seven billion divided by nineteen million is three hundred sixty eight point four eight. SO, ONLY 368 CORONAVIRUS DEATHS WORLDWIDE9? (assuming similar conditions elsewhere)
What does this mean? In as many senses as could be imagined?
Seems pretty clear.
The doctor from the study says that the OAN findings are a "misrepresentation" of the study results. I read the research paper, this research was done in June of this year, which most of the research done then has been invalidated by more recent research. Also, the articles used in the report for references are from May. The report does not indicate the same conclusion that his reporter found. Yes the numbers may be the same, however, the numbers correlate with communities of more than 500,00 people, which is not representative of America, and with case studies not formed in every state, only about 5 states are used. The conclusion of the paper states a broad range of numbers, and declares that this study is limited by the current numbers (which was in June and May).
Really
"Sensation Sells"
Conspiracy Theories go put your foil hat back on
Great work as usual OAN & Pearson Sharp!