Mondays- 1pm Mountain Time- You can download the app right on your phone and listen live or past shows here on iheart radio. https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-loving-liberty-radio-30214025/

https://lovingliberty.net/

The Loving Liberty Radio network is a national media platform that promotes and shares the bedrock principles of private property, free markets, individual liberty and religious freedom. Join our hosts each day, all day, for the news of the day, insights, discussion and two-way talk.

60 Day Trial of the Superblend. Read my testimonial here…

Announcement to any sitting U.S Senator or Congressman… I propose a Federally mandated bill called the -No More Child or Adolescent Clothing Act of 2020-

No more little clothes (or socks) can be manufactured, sown, made, produced, knitted, etc. for any child under the age of 18, in any store in America- and cannot be imported from any country. Ever.

The only material that can be made is up to seven, one-piece jump suits (per child), color coated to the individual child in the home. They can be handed down from child to child to save money and time.

As a result, parents, child care givers, and housekeepers will be able to keep their sanity, nerves, and no longer have massive panic attacks several times a week.

Upon signature of the President, all little clothes with be burnt forever.

Thank you,

Eric Moutsos

Sorry this needs government intervention

One of the problems with this “toxic masculinity” idea that’s being pushed in every which direction, including Gillette commercials, is they are only focusing on problems with a small number of men who bully and abuse. And they are making it look like it’s only men that have these problems and need to universally change. 

Could they have just said, “toxic behavior in everyone”? Why is anyone attacking any gender? I thought that was off-limits? If you don’t think that commercial was not demeaning to men, think again. 

What if a commercial came out from a lady product talking about some women who bully and abuse? But make it look like all women have an internal problem that needs to universally change? Would that ad air? No, that ad would not air. Because guess what, there would be protests up and down every street by feminists. 

Further, some women can be nasty little creatures, too. Some of the craziest fights I was in as a cop, were against strong nasty women. In fact, the only person that tried to disarm me and reached for my gun, was a woman. Yes, she was slammed to the ground like a man and taken to jail. 

Truth- Some men bully and abuse and it’s not all men’s fault, or the genetic makeup of a man. Toxic behavior is a behavior. One of the reasons God created man to be strong, especially physically, is to protect and provide for his family. Its healthy to be masculine. 

The vast majority of men did not need, and do not need a me-too type movement to “realize” not to rape and abuse women. Why? Because the vast majority of men don’t rape and abuse women. Sorry Gillette, you’re not the best a man can get anymore. In fact you never were, your razors aren’t that great anyway. 

Men, hold your head’s high for the gifts and power God has given you. This is just another decorated arrow aimed to destroy the family, and in this case, the Divine nature of a man. Don’t give into this.Going to now go lift some weights, listen to Eye of the Tiger, and grunt the whole time.

And by the way Gillette, your cheerleaders bodies are being exploited for your personal gain. Can’t have it both ways.


A lot of people have asked me why it was a bad move by Mitt Romney to criticize the President the way he did a few days ago. And specifically, why I care that Romney of all people, would.

The more and more I think about it, the more it frustrates me he did what he did, and the way he did it.

Why?

Because you can’t be taken seriously after running to Trump on three different occasions, for his help to help further your political career, and then turn around and bash him for not having moral character.

2012: “Can I get your endorsement to help me?” Trump “Yes”. Mitt: “Thank you, you’re great.” Three seconds later: “Trump is a fake and a fraud.” After Trump wins President “Can I come get a job with you?” Trump: “Let’s look into it.” Mitt: “Thank you you’re great.” Three seconds later: Bashes him again in the media. 2018: “Can I get your endorsement in a state that I don’t live in for Senate? Trump: “Yes, go get em, let’s work as a team.” Mitt: “Thank you, you’re great.” Three seconds later: “Donald Trump doesn’t have the moral character to hold the Presidential mantle.” blasted through a liberal ragweed. (Then goes on CNN two seconds after that?)

Now, do I think Trump has a great moral compass? No I don’t. I’m not a “No-matter-what Trumper” I believe we should criticize when ANY president makes bad policy moves. Trump does good things and Trump does bad things. He’s not a prophet or a savior. But he is a fighter for certain things (That NEED to happen in America) and someone we need in officer right now. Nobody else could get some of the things done that needs done.

So with that said…

Mitt Romney attacking Trumps “moral character” AFTER getting what he wanted from Trump to further his political career is a huge lack of moral character.

Why would you want an endorsement, then a job, then an endorsement again, from a fake immoral person? You wouldn’t unless you were just as fake. Especially when you pretended to live full time in a state and USING the state of Utah (her people) for your political career? Does anyone else see the hypocrisy in this?

I believe this stems from jealousy that he doesn’t hold the office that Trump has, and desperately wants. That’s the truth. He’s addicted to himself it seems.

I’m from the state of Utah and disapprove fully of what Mitt Romney had to say, and he does not represent MANY in the state of Utah. In fact, he’s making Utah look foolish. Please go back to Mass or California, Mitt, where you actually live. Retire. Go to your great family and volunteer in soup kitchen if you want to serve people. For real, man. Please stop what you’re doing, and go back home. The President has problems, yes, we all know that, but you’re not helping him make America great again by pretending to be any better than he is.

If Mitt would have put 1/2 the fight he puts toward Trump, in the Obama race, he would have very well been the “Chief” of them all and had a little bit more room to talk.

Power in the people-

“America did not create our God given rights. Our God given rights created America. And the power is in people God created.”

I don’t think we realize the value and power we could have as a united people. The power we should have as people. I also don’t think we realize the power we don’t have as a people because of the lack of engagement and commitment to liberty. It’s our fault in so many ways that we’ve come to this.

So many think our rights are given to us by the government; and we should be grateful to the government for all they give. What Caesar gives, Caesar can take away. Wrong. Our rights are and were given to us by God. We should never forget where that power came from.

The Bill of Rights were not government gifts to the people they could pull away at any moment. No, they were restrictions and rules we the people put on the government to not mess with us. It seems to be the exact opposite today.

America did not create our God given rights. Our God given rights created America. And the power is in people God created.

This is a little lengthy but it’s been on my mind for a few days. Would love your thoughts.

What is it that we can do to start growing together as Americans vs. tearing each other apart at every turn and news cycle? Especially trying to stay true to certain principles and convictions each holds or does not hold? Is it even possible with such drastic and different foundations under each of us?

It seems like no matter what- and I mean no matter what- if we vocalize a certain belief or passion in a principle we believe in, the “war” is inevitable and we come across as “dividing haters” and not lovers. But when you think about it, some of the greatest lovers in history are in fact, dividers. Who had very strong political and moral beliefs in their day.

I look at the greatest stands certain people took in history, especially at the moment in time they took them, and controversy was truly an understatement for them. From the Founding Fathers, Abraham Lincoln, Rosa Parks, Sophi Scholl, Oscar Schindler, Martin Luther King Jr, Winston Churchill, this list goes on and on, they stood and fought. And they changed the world.

During their “fight”, they had not only haters constantly on them, but people who wanted to kill them. In fact, many of they were ultimately murdered because of the “divide” they caused.

I really believe we are in a cultural tipping-point with so many issues, that whether one vocalizes them, or not, there is a great divide happening right in front of our eyes. It’s also more of a spiritual divide than we think. And each of us is inevitably taking a side. Not to speak is to speak and not to act is to act. It’s happening in each one of us whether we want it or not. We are choosing by virtue of just being alive.

I believe God has placed each one of us into a spiritually (principled) war-type predicament. Where He needs certain people to rise up and fight for His causes of righteousness. But what we can’t do is pretend the war isn’t happening. Because we will either become an automatic casualty, or be fighting for a side we don’t even know we signed up for. That’s how it works.

Some would think that Jesus isn’t a “divider” in some instances, however I disagree. Certain universal laws can and only will divide us collectively if we aren’t in sync spiritually. Why? because certain universal laws cannot be broken or changed. And when the law is either introduced or emphasized, we must choose.

“Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.” Matt 10:34-35

The answer truly is love. But love comes in different forms and it’s not always comfortable.

But should love always equate to agreement?

Can we 100% disagree and still 100% love?

Maybe not, but I believe we can try.

I believe we can have really hard conversations about really difficult topics, and still love one another. Respect one another during the cultural “wars” that wage around us. Because we have to fight them. We must fight them.

I feel like we are more divided (at this time) than I’ve ever seen or felt in my short 36 yrs of life. I know there’s an answer (besides staying quiet) where we can have these conversations -in disagreement- and still somehow grow as a people. Again, that is love.

Christ did it. He too was ultimately crucified for what His Father wanted Him to teach and do everyday. But he did it. He had those very difficult conversations and actions with a complete and perfect love. And the devil and all of hell were after him the whole time. It makes me want to do better. Makes me want to love more. It also makes me want to fight harder for truth in that love. I believe that’s the answer to make a true difference.