[ad_1]

Christina Bobb discusses the large margin by which Joe Biden likely lost.

source
[ad_2]

49 replies
  1. Cory C says:

    Sequester the ballots for after the election. Audit & recount by the army. Then SCOTUS all cheated GOP candidates put in & kick out all cheating Democrats.

  2. ty.andrea Henderson says:

    In September of 2020 Dallas Jones, a senior Biden campaign official was
    arrested and charged with running a ballot harvesting operation. Article published by the Oregon Conservative news, November 15, 2020. The fraud, crimes, and massive corruption against President Trump's re-election is deep and wide. The media and their controllers spent huge amounts of money and time to "uncover" Russian collusion against President Trump–the least that can be done now is to spend the time and money to expose this actual democratic collusion of voter fraud against President Trump and our form of government.

  3. C. A. G. says:

    Chrissy, there's enough Fake News out there without you adding to it. Wyoming, Vermont, South Dakota, South Carolina, Oklahoma, Delaware and Mississippi have ALL certified their election results. More will follow. The certification only matters in battleground states but NO certification matters until the Electoral College meets and votes. The courts can overrule certifications and the state legislatures can overrule EVERYONE.

  4. Giorgio Cooper says:

    2020 election = the biggest election fraud in the history of Western democracies committed of course by the corrupt Dems ! Having said this, the US banana republic election system which literally invites voter fraud needs urgent fixing. Copying the best / safest election system of Europe will do.

  5. Paul Weismann says:

    Wake dafuq up, Biden could never be elected…there’s not enough people who can be that stupid…you’d have to be stuck in some basement and only watch CNN to believe that a career politician who’s spent 47 years taking bribes, laundering money, and sniffing every child within a 10 foot radius could or should ever be president…NO!!! It had to be a plot to control the vote tally by any means necessary. How can a do nothing, senile, stuttering, gaffer become president? They padded the numbers so exorbitantly that it is simply unbelievable. It’s unfathomable and impossible for that many people to ever vote for an animated cadaver. There’s nothing that could convince me that this wasn’t a rigged election.

  6. CDR POSSE COMITATUS says:

    The Republicans must keep their eye on the ball(VOTER FRAUD) and not get themselves distracted……by the Democrats Ballyhooing Racism, and White Supremacy on the part of the Trump campaign.
    Everyone of the Democratic Parties amped up allegations are just plain NOT TRUE(Which is typical of the Democrats)
    Stick to the facts and don't overplay the investigation……keep it SIMPLE and ON TRACK

  7. 2218_life says:

    The fraud has been going on a lot longer than a few decades. Read up.

    "…the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States do not necessarily include all the rights protected by the first eight amendments to the Federal constitution against the powers of the Federal government."
    Maxwell v Dow, 20 S.C.R. 448, at pg 455;
    //
    "The only absolute and unqualified right of a United States citizen is to residence within the territorial boundaries of the United States," US vs. Valentine 288 F. Supp. 957
    //
    "Civil rights under the 14th amendment
    are for Federal citizens and not State
    Citizens; Federal citizens, as parents,
    have no right to the custody of their
    infant children except subject to the
    paramount right of the State."Wadleigh
    v. Newhall, Circuit Court N. Dist. Cal., Mar
    13, 1905
    //
    “[T]he term "citizen," in the United States, is analogous to the term "subject" in the
    common law.” State vs Manual 20 NC 122, 14 C.J.S. 4, p 430
    //
    "The term resident and citizen of the
    United States is distinguished from a
    Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress." U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)
    //
    “Citizenship is a political status, and may be defined and privilege limited by Congress.” Ex Parte (NG) Fung Sing, Federal Reporter, 2nd Series, Vol. 6, Page 670 (1925)
    //
    "Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an "individual entity." Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773
    //
    “A “US Citizen” upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in “interstate commerce”, as a “resident” does not have the common-law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of the several states.” Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625. (1914)
    //
    "We 3 decline to overrule the opinion of Chief Justice Marshall: We hold that the District of Columbia is not a state within Article 3 of the Constitution. In other words cases between citizens of the District and those of the states were not included of the catalogue of controversies over which the Congress could give jurisdiction to the federal courts by virtue of Article 3. In other words Congress has exclusive legislative jurisdiction over citizens of Washington District of Columbia and through their plenary power nationally covers those citizens even when in one of the several states as though the district expands for the purpose of regulating its citizens wherever they go throughout the states in union" National Mutual Insurance Company of the District of Columbia v. Tidewater Transfer Company, 337 U.S. 582, 93 L.Ed. 1556 (1948);
    //
    "AN ACT To enact the Uniform Commercial Code for the District of Columbia, and for other purposes." 77 Stat 630 Public Law 88-243
    //
    “(h) The United States is located in the District of Columbia.” Uniform Commercial Code Sec. 9.307. LOCATION OF DEBTOR.
    //
    “Two national governments exist, one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions, the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument” Dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall Harlan. Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 1901
    //

    Take a look at these quotes before checking off “U.S. citizen” on another government form.  You do have a choice other than “U.S. citizen.”  Just because the government limits your choices on their forms (in an attempt to force or trick you into accepting U.S. citizenship), doesn’t mean you have to fall for their tricks.  You can check “other,” which would be either a state citizen or an American National of the United States “of America.”  Here is what the courts have said about citizenship:

    State citizenship case law
    //
    U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873) “The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.”
    //
    “We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several States.  Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of it's own…”  United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)
    //
    “…he was not a citizen of the United States, he was a citizen and voter of the State,…”  “One may be a citizen of a State an yet not a citizen of the United States”.  McDonel v. The State, 90 Ind. 320 (1883)
    //
    “That there is a citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a state,…”  Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927)
    //
    “A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government …”  Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383
    //
    “Taxpayers are not [de jure] State Citizens.”  Belmont v. Town of Gulfport, 122 So. 10.
    //
    State v. Manuel, 20 NC 122: “the term 'citizen' in the United States, is analogous to the term `subject' in common law; the change of phrase has resulted from the change in government.”
    //
    Supreme Court: Jones v. Temmer, 89 F. Supp 1226: “The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights, nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship.”
    //
    Supreme Court: US vs. Valentine 288 F. Supp. 957: “The only absolute and unqualified right of a United States citizen is to residence within the territorial boundaries of the United States.”
    //
    The Amendment (14th) recognized that “an individual can be a Citizen of one of the several states without being a citizen of the United States,” (U.S. v. Anthony, 24 Fed. Cas. 829, 830), or, “a citizen of the United States without being a Citizen of a state.” (Slaughter-House Cases, supra; cf. U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542, 549 (1875)).
    //
    A more recent case is Crosse v. Bd. of Supervisors, 221 A.2d 431 (1966) which says: “Both before and after the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of his state.” Citing U.S. v. Cruikshank, supra.
    //
    The courts presume you to be a federal citizen, without even telling you that there are different classes of citizens. It is up to you dispute this. See…
    //
    “Unless the defendant can prove he is not a citizen of the United States, the IRS has the right to inquire and determine a tax liability.” U.S. v. Slater, 545 Fed. Supp. 179,182 (1982).
    //
    “There are, then, under our republican form of government, two classes of citizens, one of the United States and one of the state.”  Gardina v. Board of Registrars of Jefferson County, 160 Ala. 155; 48 So. 788 (1909)
    //
    “The governments of the United States and of each state of the several states are distinct from one another. The rights of a citizen under one may be quite different from those which he has under the other.”  Colgate v. Harvey, 296 U.S. 404; 56 S.Ct. 252 (1935)
    //
    “…rights of national citizenship as distinct from the fundamental or natural rights inherent in state citizenship.”  Madden v. Kentucky, 309 U.S. 83: 84 L.Ed. 590 (1940)
    //
    “There is a difference between privileges and immunities belonging to the citizens of the United States as such, and those belonging to the citizens of each state as such.”  Ruhstrat v. People, 57 N.E. 41 (1900)
    //
    “…the first eight amendments have uniformly been held not to be protected from state action by the privilege and immunities clause [of the 14th Amendment].”  Hague v. CIO, 307 US 496, 520
    //
    “The right to trial by jury in civil cases, guaranteed by the 7th Amendment…and the right to bear arms guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment…have been distinctly held not to be privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the 14th Amendment…and in effect the same decision was made in respect of the guarantee against prosecution, except by indictment of a grand jury, contained in the 5th Amendment…and in respect of the right to be confronted with witnesses, contained in the 6th Amendment…it was held that the indictment, made indispensable by the 5th Amendment, and trial by jury guaranteed by the 6th Amendment, were not privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, as those words were used in the 14th Amendment. We conclude, therefore, that the exemption from compulsory self-incrimination is not a privilege or immunity of National citizenship guaranteed by this clause of the 14th Amendment.”  Twining v. New Jersey, 211 US 78, 98-99

  8. David Barkin says:

    You can tell the election was a Fraud because in HIS OWN HOME TOWN he only got 14.5 percent of the vote. No President in American History has ever lost his home town. They expect us to believe that the people who know Trump the best, didn't support him? Who are they kidding?

    MAGA!

  9. jsl5570 says:

    The recount in GA is a farce. No signature verification. The ballots are supposed to be checked by 2 staff members. Reports of only 1 reading off the vote and the other recording it without verification. One observer said he witnessed 3 times in 3 minutes where the verbal claim of a Biden vote was really a Trump vote. That would make 60 votes per hour incorrectly given to Biden at one table. Multiply that by dozens of tables and that could be thousands per hour.

  10. Avg Murican says:

    There’s serious collusion going on here when multiple states stop counting at the same time when Trump’s ahead and car loads of ballots mysteriously show up in the dead of night…all for Biden, many with no down-ballot votes and poll watchers are barred from the process along with large cardboard barriers. They’re not even hiding this fraud.

  11. johnny85612 says:

    OAN is the best….they tell it how is is………..Trump won by an avalanche of votes……..there is no way in hell that Biden won…He couldn't even hold ten people in a rally……….Trump probably won california too…….he turned it red

  12. vita lule says:

    Christina Bobb you are so truthful person and maybe great future president of United States, please continue expose the corruption of Demon Crats, for they are from the devil and Biden is the most corrupt human being

  13. ashley demonte says:

    I dont know what drugs you are on but It really makes you scary, There is only one savior in this world and he brought the Virus to punish America and they are still stubborn, look at how many deaths there are today because their leader does not want them to wear a mask, do any of you have any visions of how to get rid of the evil dictator please go and check how many lies and doubts he has spread to his people its out there and on tape and he always had an excuse when he was asked to own up to his lies. , propaganda, how dumb can you all be. I challenge you I will shave my head bald if Trump comes back will you and all the following who has posted comments do the same in January when Joe Biden is sworn in…..

  14. Hay Day Tinker Terri says:

    I’d still like to know why after the Election the Mayor of Philadelphia said that Trump should just “put on his big boy pants and admit defeat” when they were still counting ballots for days after his truly bias remark. It seems he must have been aware of what the outcome was supposed to end up being by the time the Dems cheated to win. Pennsylvania was no where close to being called at that time.

  15. pranjanac says:

    I bet, if you repeat the election now, with vote in person, no mail in ballot, Biden wouldn't win more then 50 million votes. This is the biggest sham that USA ever experienced.

  16. Insanely Great! says:

    Excellent report Christina: The candidate who won Dem primary with massive horse trading and deal cutting and was been propped up like Weekend at Bernies WON????!!! TRUMP2020!! and TRUMP2024 for wasting his time on useless conspiracies and scandals!! USA USA 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Comments are closed.